Is it okay for Christians to use gay chat sites?

Homosexuality is often controversial within Christianity, although it’s becoming more accepted. If you’re gay and Christian, you may be struggling with this and wondering if it’s okay for you to use gay chat sites, such as Gay Chat IO.

What does God think of homosexuality?

Many gay people within Christian circles feel God doesn’t think they’re worthy of their relationships and that homosexuality is a sin. Other Christians believe God doesn’t have a problem with gay relationships. Some Christians think that God is perfect and all things are in his hands and there is no room for human error in that.

It’s a good question, but it’s impossible to know what God thinks. You may be comforted by the words of Jesus, “If you are looking for your soul mate, you will find it when you least expect it.”

Does God hate gay people?

No, God does not hate gay people. God loves all his children. He has a loving heart, and wants to have a relationship with all people.

So, it seems to me that if you have a problem with homosexual relationships, you got some work to do in understanding the Bible.

I’ve always believed that God would never have gay people because of the way that gay people feel about themselves, but I believe that God will use the homosexual person’s suffering in order to produce good from it. That’s why I believe God blesses the marriages of homosexual people.

Gay people who are living a homosexual life are being blessed with good relationships and with the ability to influence other people for the cause of the Lord. So, to me, it doesn’t matter if God hates gay people or if God doesn’t have a problem with them.

However, in my opinion, God doesn’t have to be involved with gay people. They have their own free will and they can choose to have a homosexual life, but God doesn’t have to be involved.

My Final Thoughts

As a Christian, I don’t see my Christian responsibility as being to prevent homosexual relationships from happening; rather, my responsibility is to be the most supportive person I can be for the people who I love. If God has a part in this life of the person, I think it would be my responsibility to encourage and bless their relationship.

There’s no one correct way to live a Christian life, and that’s what I think makes Christianity so amazing. As long as a person is being true to the ways of the Lord, I don’t think that the Lord would ever say that they were doing something wrong. I just think that we all need to take some time to learn and understand the Bible and how it works.

I believe that God can use any circumstance and any person in a way that can make a difference in someone’s life, and if that’s the way it is, that’s how I’ll treat the people in my life.

Best Christian Dating Sites

In the Tinder era, it’s hard enough to find a worthy match. Christian dating websites that offer faith-based questions – based questions that will help you find the most suitable match. More recently, there are “dating” apps strictly for finding hookups like AdultFriendFinder that have taken things further.

Dating sites for Christian men and women as well as Christian dating sites for men and women offer a variety of questions and answers about their religion to help you find the right choice for you, not just for a night stand or date.


Zoosk does not fall into the category of a “Christian dating site,” but it has the largest membership base in the world. It’s in fact it is one of the most popular dating services for Christian men and women, just based on the huge number of users.

Although it is not technically a “Christian dating” site, it allows you to choose your religion and offers a wide range of options in terms of religion, from a – night watch to long-term – relationships.

Christian Mingle

Christian Mingle has been around for over 20 years, so size is a big bonus, as the user base is the key element that makes the dating site successful.

This is one of the most popular and popular exclusive dating sites in the world, and it has been around for years. This internationally known dating site is an alternative to the more regular, popular sites that are not specifically targeted at Christians. 

Christian Cafe

Christian Cafe is simply one of the most popular and popular dating sites in the world for Christians. It’s a christian dating site that offers a wide range of dating options as well as a wide selection of Catholic – focused magazines. The Facebook page itself has more than 100,000 members and over 1.5 million followers on Facebook.

With its easy-to-use interface, easy to register and a wide range of dating options, it makes it much easier to scroll through profiles for hours and look for someone special. 

Christian Date

If your faith is a concern or curiosity when dating, Christian Date is the perfect place to start, and a quick search for members shows that plenty of Christian singles are ready to meet you. Let’s be clear: this site is not a “Christian dating app,” so if you don’t use it to search for contacts, meet non-Christian singles, or do anything that gets in the way of your relationship with God, then you should be fine.

Christian Mingle

If Jesus is an important part of your life and you want to find a partner who shares your faith, then Christian Mingle is the best online dating site for you. The very targeted features of this site, which really combine the best of match of eHarmony, make it tempting to use it as a regular dating site. Technically, it offers services for secular singles, but is not a “faith-focus” date page and is intended for users of all faiths who often confuse it with Christian – dating sites only. 

My Closing Thoughts

Just because an online dating site is not 100% for Christians, it doesn’t mean it can’t be an incredible resource for Christian singles. Whether you are looking for a date with someone who shares your convictions, a good Christian dating service can make it much easier to find online dating sites. Whether you are just casually Christian or serious about it, the right site can help you find the perfect fit for your faith and love. If you are interested in taking control of your dating life instead of having a dating site, you can join some of the best Christian dating sites. 

3 Reasons to Believe in Creationism

There are plenty of people who think that science holds all the answers. As we are becoming reliant on technology, we start to believe that those creating it must be right. Scientists mostly believe in evolution. And it sounds somewhat reasonable given their evidence.

However, the studies are skewed. Much like in the Roman Days of Christian persecution, scientists who believe and publish evidence supporting creationism are persecuted. Doing such a thing leads to their rejection from the scientific community on the basis that they don’t do good science.

Contrary to that belief, there is plenty of reasons to believe in a higher power over the so called facts science has to offer. While we live in a world dominated by technology, sometimes faith offers a genuine answer to our questions.

Here are several reasons why you ought to believe in a God over the myth of the big bang.

1. Nature is too Complex

If you’ve ever looked around at the world, you might notice that nature and biology are incredibly complex. It’s very difficult to believe that things as complex as humans and animals and the entire planet came from an accident.

A great example is that of the giraffe. It has a valve in it’s neck that allows it to put its head up and down without disrupting blood flow to it’s brain and killing it. How could giraffes had evolved to have that valve if the first giraffes would have died from irregular blood flow?

There is even research that suggests that it would take too long for the entire world to evolve the way it has.

2. Science Doesn’t have all the Answers

While science is important, it’s equally important to realize that a scientist doesn’t have all the answers to the world. The world of science can’t answer questions about ethics and emotions.

The scientific method can’t give you a way to live your life; they can’t give you a way of living your life that is good and righteous.

You should look to a higher power when it comes to understanding matters of the heart.

3. Kindness suggests a benevolent God

When people do good things, it isn’t because of science. It’s because there is something in human beings that makes us care for one another and love each other.

Because kindness is a quality that humans have, it suggests that we were created by a higher power that is infinitely loving.

According to science the only reason that an organism would do something selfless is to further its genes. This kind of explains a mother’s love for their children.

However, this does not explain why human beings go out of their way to help one another for any other reason than familial reasons.

Human kindness cannot be explained by science because it does not necessarily further the survival of genes. Because of this, there must be another explanation for human kindness – and human existence – of which the best is that there is a God.

If you want more reasons to believe in God, then check out the video below!

5 Reasons Creationism is Valid

Despite what scientists would have you believe, The Big Bang theory is flawed (as is the show. I mean really have you seen it?). The theory is not as airtight.

There are plenty of flaws in the theory of evolution of the entire world.

Scientists like to believe and perpetuate the idea that their science when it comes to evolution is perfect and infallible, but there are flaws, but they’re just doing their best to hide them.

There are plenty of flaws in the theory of evolution, so many in fact that it actually makes more sense to believe in a god. I know crazy right, ignore science and believe in archaic religion, what an insane suggestion.

But hear me out, you have to give the other side a chance too.

But if you’re unwilling to give religion a chance, allow me to at least point out the flaws in evolution so that you might be willing to look into the idea that there might be a God who created us all. Please, feel free to check my research. But I promise that I’m right!

Here are just a few flaws in the evolutionary theory that make sense to point out:

1. The Timeline is off

While people suggest that it’s perfectly reasonable that the entire world and all of nature could have evolved to function the way it does now in the amount of time the earth as been alive (thanks to carbon dating we know how old that is) it’s extremely unlikely.

The odds of even just one organism evolving to perfection in the time the earth has been in existence, much less the time that the atmosphere has existed.

It just doesn’t make sense that an entire complicated world could evolve in only a few million years. Which brings me to my next point…

2. Nature is Too Complicated

Have you ever actually taken the time to look around at nature? Or better yet have you looked in a mirror and taken the time to marvel at your own complexity?

Nature is insanely complicated.

Just think of the way the seasons work or how weather works. Think about how the ocean currents work or how food even manages to grow out of the ground.

It’s insanely complex. For everything to have evolved in a perfect way so that they world functions without regular disaster is impressive on its own.

For people and animals to evolve the way they did is extremely complicated and would have taken so much longer than the earth has even existed.

3. Explain Kindness

Benevolence and altruistic actions are explained by science with the survival of the fittest. Scientists basically argue that people and animals put themselves in danger for the sake of the survival of their genes. This explains why you would go out of your way for members of your own family.

However, it doesn’t explain why people would go to war or do nice things for other people in day to day life. This suggests kindness comes from something other than science, but perhaps a god.

Learn more about Creationism from the video below!

5 Things the Bible Says about the Origin of Man

Scientists have a lot to say about how the world came to be. They argue that man were once apes that were once amebas that came from lightening striking the atmosphere and creating life.

However, there are other places to look for answers. And you might not like what you find inside of those science books.

Another great place to look for answers is the bible. God wrote this book through man so that we might have answers to the most important questions, especially the ones that have to do with who we are and where we’ve come from.

The Bible has a lot to say about where we come from. While we rely a lot on science, scientists might not have the answers to everything.

Which is why you should look to the holiest of books to learn how we came about.
Here are a few things the Bible has to say about our origins:

1. He created us in his image

For a lot of this, we’re going to be looking to what the Bible says in the first book: Genesis.
It also says that he created us in his image.

So we have a pretty good idea of what God might look like!

And because of that human beings should understand how special we are to God.

2. It took 6 Days to Create the World

In Genesis, it says that in the beginning there was nothing. And then God created a whole lot of something. He created the entire world in 6 days and on the seventh he rested, which is why we have the Sabbath.

God’s immense power is demonstrated in that he managed to create everything that ever existed in the span of a less than a week.

Here the Bible offers another explanation of how the world came to be.

There wasn’t a big bang, and the world was not an accident.

3. Adam and Eve lived in Eden

God created the first humans and put them in paradise. This was God’s original plan for the human race was for us to live in paradise and in the constant presence of him.

However, we see things go a little awry in Genesis with these first humans. God gave them the opportunity to screw up, and well, guess what they did….

4. Original Sin Happened

God gave Adam and Eve one instruction: Don’t eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Satan manages to wiggle into the garden (God seems to have a soft spot for all his creations, even the fallen angels) and convince Adam and Eve to disobey.

They end up eating from the tree and getting the human race kicked out of paradise, separating humans from God until the second coming.

5. Which brings us to where we are now…

We live in a very modern world, a world vastly different from the world of both the old and new estimate and certainly very different from the paradise of Eden.

Learn more about the book of Genesis from the video below!

Darwin Didn’t Discover Evolution or Natural Selection

Charles Darwin is often portrayed as one of the greatest original thinkers of science on a par with the likes of Newton.

While his book On The Origin of Species has probably had a greater impact on society than any other book — except the Bible — most of the evolutionary views he expressed in On The Origin of Species were neither original nor scientific, but rather had their roots in Pagan materialism.

The essential “Darwinian” axiom of chance evolution by random change and “survival of the fittest” was broadly suggested by ancient Greek philosophers.

Even the more refined concept of “natural selection,” which is often viewed as a unique contribution of Darwin, was clearly expressed by many others as early as a 100 years before the 1859 publication of Origin of Species.

The French astronomer and mathematician Pierre de Maupertuis (1698-1759) is generally credited with being among the first to have developed an essentially modern theory of evolution which included a process of random change (mutation) and natural selection.

In his book Essaie de Cosmologie he said: “Chance one might say, turned out a vast number of individuals; a small proportion of these were organized in such a manner that the animals organs could satisfy their needs. A much greater number showed neither adaptation nor order; These last have all perished — thus the species which we see today are but a small part of all those that a blind destiny has produced.” Maupertuis was a very outspoken atheist who used his evolutionary speculation involving “blind destiny” and “chance” in an attempt to refute the necessity for a sovereign God and purposeful design in nature.

Charles Darwin’s ideas on evolution were anticipated in nearly every essential detail by several of his predecessors including his own grandfather, Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802) — a fact which Charles Darwin was loath to acknowledge.

Erasmus Darwin was a very highly regarded physician, and one of a group of intellectuals whose writings helped to usher in the Industrial Revolution in England. A true “renaissance man,” Erasmus Darwin was a talented poet and made important discoveries in many fields including medicine, physics, meteorology, horticulture and botany.

Some of his books (even on highly technical subjects) were written entirely in poetry! In 1794 and 1797, Erasmus Darwin published a two-volume work titled Zoonomia (subtitled The Laws of Organic Life ) in which he speculated on the chance evolution of all life by a purely materialistic mechanism involving adaptation through natural selection.

Charles Darwin’s notebooks reveal how heavily his own speculations on evolution were influenced by those of his grandfather.

Yet in what must surely be one of the most self-serving examples of “the pot calling the kettle black,” Charles Darwin sought to diminish the importance of his grandfather’s evolutionary speculations as expressed in Zoonomia by declaring: “I was much disappointed; the proportion of speculation being so large to the facts given.”

It should be recognized that not all of those who commented on natural selection before Darwin did so from an openly atheistic or even evolutionary point of view.

Indeed, natural selection is an observable phenomenon that is entirely compatible with a literal interpretation of biblical Creation.

Natural selection simply means that the natural variation which exists among the individuals of a species will render some individuals better suited to survive (and reproduce) under particular environmental circumstances than others of the same species.

Thus, heavily-furred mammals might survive a particularly cold winter better than the more lightly-furred members of their own species.

In a similar manner, a dog breeder might use “artificial selection” to select for dogs that are well suited for the particular demands of sheep herding or duck hunting. The important point is that in neither natural nor artificial selection is it possible to select for traits that are not already in the genes of the species.

The problem for the early evolutionists, who knew nothing about genetics, was the actual mechanism that produced the inherited variability required for natural selection to work. An even bigger problem — though not generally recognized by early evolutionists — was the biological source of fundamentally new traits that were not previously in the genes of the species.

Jean Baptiste de Lamarck (1744-1829) was a bitterly anti-Christian zoologist who proposed in 1809 two principles that purported to explain the source of the variation that led to new and useful structures in living organisms.

The first of these — called the “law of use and disuse” — proposed that new organs (or modification of old ones) arise spontaneously through need satisfied by “use” and, accordingly, disappear through “disuse.”

The second — called the “law of inheritance of acquired characteristics” — proposed that physical characteristics acquired by “use” are passed on to offspring. These so-called “laws” are perhaps best illustrated by the popular example of the giraffe’s neck.

According to Lamarck, the giraffe once had a neck no longer than that of a zebra, but as the early giraffes stretched their necks to feed from the highest limbs of a tree, their necks got longer and longer (as a result of use based on need).

This acquired trait was then presumably passed on to subsequent generations of giraffes who would be born with long necks.

It is now well known that the kind of physical characteristics we acquire by the use of our body, such as the development of large muscles through exercise, cannot be passed on to our offspring. This obvious fact was known even in Darwin’s time.

August Weissman actually bothered to test the “law” of the inheritance of acquired characters by cutting off the tails of 57 generations of mice. It should have surprised no one that even after bobbing the tails of 57 generations of mice, none were ever born without tails.

Still, Darwin had no better explanation for genetic variability and was ambivalent about Lamarck’s “laws,” which he variously praised and condemned.